next up previous
Next: Non-invertibility of knotted surfaces Up: Applications Previous: Minimal number of type

Tangle embeddings

The number of Fox colorings, as well as branched coverings and quantum invariants, was used as obstructions to tangle embeddings (see, for example, [PSW04*]). Cocycle invariants can be used as obstructions as well. We illustrate the method by an example. Consider the weight sum (the sum of cocycle values) of a tangle $ T$ for a coloring such that the boundary points of the tangle are required to have the same color. If the tangle $ T$ is a subtangle of a link $ L$, such a coloring extends to a coloring of $ L$ by choosing the color of the boundary points of $ T$ for all arcs of $ L$ outside of $ T$. Then the weight sum for $ L$ is the same as that of $ T$ for these colorings. Hence the cocycle invariant of $ L$ must have the same contribution.

Figure: A colored tangle
\begin{figure}\begin{center}
\mbox{
\epsfxsize =1.5in
\epsfbox{tangle.eps}}
\end{center}\end{figure}

For example, see the colored tangle in Fig. [*], which has the weight sum $ 2 \in \mathbb{Z}_3$. Hence this does not embed in any link that does not have $ 2$ in its cocycle invariant with $ R_3$.


next up previous
Next: Non-invertibility of knotted surfaces Up: Applications Previous: Minimal number of type
Masahico Saito - Quandle Website 2005-09-29