Research Philosophy
I am an ecohydrologist, with B.A. and M.S. in ecology and a Ph.D. in hydrogeology. My research is focused on surface water and shallow groundwater interactions and on the interrelationships between surface water, shallow groundwater, and ecosystem structure and function in wetland, river, estuary, and near-shore marine ecosystems. I approach all problems with an ecosystem perspective, but use tools typical to both ecology and hydrogeology to answer questions. My ultimate interest lies in the development and implementation of whole-system approaches to river and wetland ecosystem functional assessment, restoration, and management. When
faced with managing degraded ecosystems, we can pursue one
of four courses of action: we can do nothing; we can restore
the ecosystems to pre-existing conditions; we can enhance
certain ecosystem functions at the expense of others; or
we can create alternative ecosystems that are sustainable
under existing and presumed future conditions. In each of
the latter three courses of action, we must know specifically
how the ecosystems function since they are easy to dismantle
but more difficult to reconstruct. Specific linkages between
physical, chemical, and biological attributes and processes
need to be assessed and understood so that all necessary
linkages can be repaired, regardless of whether restoration,
enhancement, or creation courses of action are pursued. This
is a broad research agenda, so interdisciplinary collaboration
is critical to my success.
Some selected projects are briefly described below. |
The Role of Groundwater-Controlled Thermal Reugia in Supporting Juvenile Salmonid Habitat, Kenai Peninsula, Alaska

This is a collaborative project that brings together principle investigators from Alaska Department of Fish & Game/Kachemak Bay Research Reserve, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Baylor University, and the University of South Florida. This project builds on previous work to gain an understanding of how wetlands associated with headwater streams on the lower Kenai Peninsula contribute to juvenile fish habitat. The previous work investigated the relationship between wetlands in differing geomorphic settings, headwater stream habitat, and aquatic fauna. This project is expanding that knowledge to include an understanding of the hydrologic relationships between the wetlands and streams. All results will be attributed to the Kenai Lowlands Wetland Management Tool, a GIS-based resource used by planners, managers, and residents.
Many colleagues
are collaborating on this project, including but
not limited to Coowe Walker (Alaska Department of Fish & Game/Kachemak Bay Research Reserve), Dennis Whigham (Smithsonian Environmental Research Center), and Ryan King (Baylor University). Jason Bellino is one of my current M.S.
students working on this project.
Funding
has been provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. |
Balancing the Needs of Human and Natural Systems through the Sustainable Development of Water Resources: A Case Study on the Costa Alegre, Mexico

This is an international collaborative effort that brings together principle investigators, students, and volunteers from the University of South Florida; the University of Nevada, Reno; California State University, Channel Islands; the Universidad de Guadalajara; and the Great Basin Institute. This project combines graduate and undergraduate teaching, research, and community service with on-the-ground natural resource conservation and community outreach efforts.
This project combines research, teaching, and community service with on-the-ground water-supply planning and infrastructure, natural-resource conservation, and community-outreach efforts. The overall objective is to provide current scientific information regarding the hydrological carrying capacity of the basin for the purpose of informing local and regional resource land-use planning and decision-making. Ongoing scientific studies integrate hydrology, plant ecology, aquatic ecology, and fisheries biology with citizen science, promoting a long-term natural resource and community development program for the region.
The project is ongoing, with principle investigators leading students and volunteers on regular field trips. Courses will be taught annually in spring, and volunteer efforts will be run throughout each year. Potential students should visit the course website.
Many colleagues
are collaborating on this project, including but
not limited to Kai Rains (Three Parameters Plus, Inc.), Jerry Keir (Great Basin Institute), Sudeep Chandra (University of Nevada, Reno), and Zeb Hogan (University of Nevada, Reno). Christina
Stringer is one of my current Ph.D.
students working on this project.
In 2007, the project was funded by Earthwatch volunteer and university student participation fees. In 2008, the project is being funded by university student participation fees, with university student participation fees partially offset by small grants to student participants from the UR USF--Office of Undergraduate Research and the American Water Resources Association. Currently, additional funding is being sought to maintain and expand the program and to therefore ensure ongoing and continued success if the on-the-ground water-supply planning and infrastructure, natural-resource conservation, and community-outreach efforts. |
The
Role of Hydrological Processes in Maintaining Ecosystem
Structure and Function in Mangroves

Hydrological processes have a dominant impact on the structure and function of wetland ecosystems, including coastal wetland that in the tropics are dominated by mangroves. Globally, mangroves have been impacted by a variety of activities that result in significant modifications of the original hydrologic conditions. Mangrove systems comprise ~2,500 km2 of south Florida and many are located in the Indian River Lagoon, a series of connected estuaries that extends ~250 km along the east coast of Florida. Most of the mangrove systems in the Indian River Lagoon have been ditched and impounded for mosquito control but are still hydrologically linked by surface water and groundwater pathways to the Indian River Lagoon. Our study site is a mosquito impoundment located on a carbonate barrier island near Ft. Pierce, Florida. A consequence of mangrove alterations has been the development of a complex matrix of vegetation within the impoundment that ranges from high salinity salt pannes in which no mangrove trees grow to areas adjacent to open water that support tall mangroves.
Our research focusses on the relationships between hydrological processes and ecosystem structure and function of these mangroves. Our overall objectives are to understand the relationships between hydrologic conditions at a range of scales from small-scale processes associated with nitrogen, the nutrient that limits the growth of mangroves at this site, cycling to the relationship between surface and subsurface hydrology and the distribution, structure and function of different variants of vegetation. Dominant mangroves at the study site are Rhizophora mangle (Red mangrove), Avicennia germinans (Black mangrove), and Laguncularia racemosa (White mangrove).
Many colleagues
are collaborating on this project, including but
not limited to Dennis Whigham and Ilka Feller (Smithsonian
Environmental Research Center) and Jos Verhoeven (University
of Utrecht). Christina
Stringer and Bruce Lafrenz are two of my current Ph.D.
students working on this project.
Funding
has been provided by the Smithsonian Marine Station at Ft. Pierce. |
Hydrology
of Clay Storage Areas

The phosphate
industry owns or has mineral rights to more than 440,000
acres of land
in northern and central Florida, approximately 25% of which
are river or wetland habitats. Following mining, approximately
40% of the land is covered with clay settling areas, which
are steep-sided, high-walled reservoirs as large as one square
mile, filled with supersaturated clay separated from the
phosphate and sand during processing. Potentially, hundreds
of thousands of acres of land in northern and central Florida
could someday be covered by clay settling areas. It takes
decades for the clays to dewater sufficiently to support
even light land uses. Therefore, clay settling areas are
the most conspicuous and development-limiting landforms remaining
after phosphate mining.
The effects
of the clay settling areas on water resources are largely
unknown. To be sure,
annual rainfall is captured by the clay settling areas.
However, the fate of this rainfall and the original processing
water
still contained within the clay settling area is unclear.
Does it recharge the underlying
surficial aquifer and flow to nearby wetlands and streams?
Does it recharge the underlying Floridan aquifer from which
many Floridians derive their water? Or does it simply evaporate
back to the atmosphere and not become available for any
beneficial use? This four-year project is designed
to address
these and other fundamental questions of hydrological and
ecological importance in Florida and other phosphate mining
districts around the world.
Many colleagues
are collaborating on this project including Mark Stewart (USF
Geology), Mark Ross (USF Civil & Environmental Engineering),
and Ken Trout (USF Civil & Environmental Engineering). Kathryn
Murphy and Mike
Kittridge are two of my recently-graduated M.S. students
who have worked on this project.
Funding is
being provided by the Florida Institute of Phosphate Research. |
Geological Control of Ecological Structure
and Function in Vernal Pool Wetlands

Vernal pools are depressional features that are inundated for
portions of the wet season, then drain and dry in the late wet
and early dry seasons. They occur as small, poorly-drained depressions
perched above an impermeable or very slowly permeable soil horizon
or bedrock. These wetlands typically range in size from 50 m2
to 5000 m2, with some functioning vernal pools being as small
as 30 m2. Vernal pools usually have maximum water depths less
than 1.0 m. They represent small yet complete ecosystems that
are aquatic islands surrounded by uplands. Vernal pools occur
in southern Oregon, northern Baja California, throughout California,
and in other Mediterranean-type climates of the world.
Vernal pools are best known for the biological functions that
they perform. Vernal pools are among the last remaining California
ecosystems still typically dominated by native flora. Many vernal
pool floral and macroinvertebrate species are endemic, and some
vernal pool floral and macroinvertebrate species are federally-listed
threatened and endangered species and/or state-listed endangered
and rare species. Thus, vernal pools are critical components
of regional biological conservation efforts. However, vernal
pools are rapidly being lost to agricultural or urban land uses.
For example, estimates based on soil maps, the presence of relict
vernal pools, and inference suggest that 60 to 90 percent of
the original vernal pool area in California has been lost to
agricultural or urban land uses.
Hydrology is the primary forcing function in most wetlands,
and is particularly critical in vernal pools. Vernal pool flora
are sensitive to variations in inundation duration, while vernal
pool macroinvertebrates are sensitive to variations in inundation
duration, salinity, and possibly several other water chemistry
constituents (e.g., pH, dissolved oxygen, and nutrients). It
is therefore surprising that few studies of vernal pool hydrogeology
and biogeochemistry have been conducted.
Vernal pools occur on many geologic surfaces. However, in all
cases vernal pools are underlain by impermeable or very slowly
permeable layers such as hardpans (e.g., silica-cemented duripans),
clay-rich soils, mudflows or lahars, or bedrock. This study is
focused on vernal pools on hardpans and clay-rich soils, the
most common types of vernal pool in the Central Valley of California.
Our global hypothesis is that geological processes determine
hydrogeological, biogeochemical, and biological structure and
function in vernal pools. Many parallel and complimentary studies
are being conducted under this global hypothesis.
Many colleagues
have contributed to this project, including but not limited
to Graham Fogg (UC Davis), Thomas Harter (UC
Davis), Randy Dahlgren (UC Davis), and Bob Williamson (UC Davis).
Currently, much of the work is being conducted by Bob
Williamson (UC Davis).
Funding has been provided by the California Department of Transportation. |
The Role of Reconnecting Channels and Floodplains
in the Restoration of Hydrological and Biological Structure
and Function in Riverine Ecosystems

Greater than 50 percent of the wetlands in the conterminous
United States have been lost or severely degraded due to conversion
from natural to agricultural or urban land uses. Estimates of
loss or severe degradation exceed 90 percent for all wetland
types in California and 95 percent for riparian systems in the
Sacramento Valley of California. Similar trends have been reported
throughout the world. Thus, restoration and management are considered
critical components of wetland and riparian system conservation
efforts in the United States and throughout the world.
Hydrology is the primary forcing function in wetland and riparian
systems and is the critical element in wetland and riparian system
restoration and management efforts. Hydrology is particularly
critical in riparian systems since it is the primary mechanism
by which mass and energy are transported between uplands and
downstream environments; it is the primary control on the pathways
and rates of biogeochemical processing of dissolved and particulate
matter; it provides multidimensional environmental gradients
that support diverse metazoan populations which serve as critical
pathways and mechanisms by which energy is transferred in riparian
food webs; and it plays critical roles in vegetation recruitment
and persistence. Unfortunately, very little is known about the
hydrological and related biological effects of river restoration
efforts.
This project explores the role of reconnecting a channel and
a floodplain in the restoration of hydrological and biological
structure and function in a riverine ecosystem. The project is
being organized into three linked efforts, the first of which
will treat key elements of hydrological and hydrogeological structure
and function, the second of which will treat key elements of
vegetation structure and function, and the third of which will
treat key elements of fisheries structure and function.
The project site is Bear Creek and the adjoining meadow near
Dana, California. In 1960, the Soil Conservation Service assisted
the previous landowner in a channel improvement project to enhance
grazing and farming of the meadow. This project abandoned approximately
3.5 km of existing stream channel, which consisted of a low-gradient,
meandering main channel with multiple secondary distributary
channels typical of meadows in the area. Straightened main and
secondary channels were constructed near the edges of the meadow.
Between 1960 and 1999, the straightened channel reaches incised
as much as 5 m into the alluvium. The incision led to the near
complete loss of floodplain water and sediment storage, a significant
lowering of the ground water table, the loss of riparian and
meadow plant communities, and the loss of in-stream spawning
habitat. Channel incision also led to substantial increases in
flood waves and sediment loads delivered to the Fall River.
Based on five years of pre-project surveys of hydrologic and
geomorphic conditions, including analyses of remnant channel
segments as reference reaches, the current landowner developed
a restoration and enhancement design. The project was completed
during the summer of 1999. The restored and enhanced channel
is designed to carry a bankfull discharge of approximately 200
cfs through a meandering, single-thread channel with slopes that
vary from 0.001-0.002. Approximately 2.2 miles of channel were
constructed or restored by linking newly-created channel with
remnant channel segments. Approximately 42 acres of ponds were
excavated in order to fill portions of the incised channel and
to provide gravel for the new channel. Approximately 5,000 cubic
yards of gravel were used to create more than 8,700 linear feet
of riffle habitat. More than 113,000 native plants, including
sedges, rushes, grasses, shrubs, and trees were planted on the
meadow. Bank stabilization was achieved by planting sod mats,
transplanting willows and other riparian shrubs and trees, and
installing root wads. Grade stabilization utilized rock weirs.
Many colleagues
have contributed to this project, including but not limited
to Jeff Mount (UC Davis), Chris Hammersmark (UC
Davis), and Rick Poore (StreamWise). Currently, much of the
work is being conducted by Chris
Hammersmark (UC Davis).
Funding has been provided by the current landowners, the Cantara
Trustee Council, and the Packard Foundation. |
The Effects of Reservoir Operations on Shallow
Groundwater and Vegetation Distributions in Reservoir-Fringe
Ecosystems

Currently,
there are more than 75,000 dams greater than six feet in height
in the United States, and the reservoirs created
by these dams cover approximately three percent of the nation’s
land surface. Most reservoirs are managed exclusively for traditional
purposes: municipal and irrigation water supply, hydroelectric
power, flood control, and recreation. However, there is growing
interest in managing these reservoir resources, at least in part,
for the maintenance of plant and wildlife habitats. Virtually
all of the discussion surrounding this management objective is
centered on the downstream effects of reservoir operations on
flow regimes, vegetation distributions in the near-channel area,
and channel morphology and in-channel fish habitat. Thus, decommissioning
reservoirs or otherwise restoring natural flow regimes has been
the focus of many recent efforts. This approach, however, does
not always clearly result in net ecosystem benefits.
Reservoir construction often leads to the development of new
habitats in reservoir-fringe areas such as emergent marshes,
wet meadows, scrub-shrub wetlands, and riparian forests. These
habitats can be regionally unique and, therefore, can serve as
critical habitats for regionally uncommon plant and wildlife
species. Decommissioning reservoirs or otherwise altering reservoir
operations can restore some channel and floodplain functions
but can degrade or eliminate these regionally unique reservoir-fringe
ecosystems. Thus, reservoir-fringe ecosystems should be considered
in the context of the maintenance of plant and wildlife habitats.
This is particularly true for reservoirs that are unlikely to
be decommissioned due to their socioeconomic importance and for
reservoirs that are located directly upstream from reservoirs
or otherwise impaired water courses.
This project explored surface water and groundwater origins
and interaction and associated vegetation distributions in riverine
and reservoir-fringe systems. The overall objective of this effort
was to develop concepts and tools for the planning, implementation,
and monitoring stages of river and reservoir management efforts.
This project was organized into three linked efforts. In the
first effort, the primary sources of the shallow groundwater
were identified. In the second effort, the roles of stream discharge,
regional groundwater discharge, and reservoir stage in controlling
shallow groundwater were characterized. In the third effort,
a linked groundwater and vegetation distribution model was presented
and used to simulate groundwater and vegetation distributions
under different reservoir operations.
Many colleagues contributed to this project, including but not
limited to Jeff Mount (UC Davis), Eric Larsen (UC Davis), and
Graham Fogg (UC Davis).
Funding has been provided by a cooperative agreement between
the United States Bureau of Reclamation and Ducks Unlimited and
a gift from the Peter and Nora Stent Fund of the Peninsula Community
Foundation. |
|